ReviewScience China. Life sciences2025
Stem cell-based embryo models: a tool to study early human development.
Review in Science China. Life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-species comparative transcriptomic analysis of spermatozoa reveals species-specific regulatory networks linked to fertilization-associated genes in cattle, sheep and goats.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Single-nucleus multi-omics dissection of dysregulated trophoblast development and disrupted immune microenvironment in complete hydatidiform moles.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- NELFA supports naïve pluripotency and drives 8C-like state in human embryonic stem cells.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Wnt/β-Catenin Activation by iCRT3 Enhanced the Pluripotency of Bovine Expanded Pluripotent Stem Cells.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- TFAP2A+ embryonic progenitor cells undergo fate diversification to give rise to human amnion, germline, and mesoderm.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How a mammalian fertilized egg acquires totipotency and develops into a full-term offspring is a fundamental scientific question. Human embryonic development is difficult to study due to limited resources, technical challenges and ethics. Moreover, the precise regulatory mechanism underlying early human embryonic development remains unknown. In recent years, the emergence of stem cell-based embryo models (SCBEM) provides the opportunity to reconstitute pre- to post-implantation development in vitro. These models to some extent mimic the embryo morphologically and transcriptionally, and thus may be used to study key events in mammalian pre- and post-implantation development. Many groups have successfully generated SCBEM of the mouse and human. Here, we provide a comparative review of the mouse and human SCBEM, discuss the capability of these models to mimic natural embryos and give a perspective on their potential future applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39969747What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.