Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969765›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025

Retaking assessment system based on the inspiratory state of chest X-ray image.

Naoki Matsubara, Atsushi Teramoto, Manabu Takei, Yoshihiro Kitoh, Satoshi Kawakami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naoki MatsubaraDivision of Radiology, Shinshu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan. nmatsubara@shinshu-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2911-4188
Atsushi TeramotoFaculty of Engineering, Meijo University, 1-501 Shiogamaguchi, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya, 468-8502, Japan.
Manabu TakeiDivision of Radiology, Shinshu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Yoshihiro KitohDivision of Radiology, Shinshu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Satoshi KawakamiDepartment of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan.

Funding

Shinshu University HG0304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When taking chest X-rays, the patient is encouraged to take maximum inspiration and the radiological technologist takes the images at the appropriate time. If the image is not taken at maximum inspiration, retaking of the image is required. However, there is variation in the judgment of whether retaking is necessary between the operators. Therefore, we considered that it might be possible to reduce variation in judgment by developing a retaking assessment system that evaluates whether retaking is necessary using a convolutional neural network (CNN). To train the CNN, the input chest X-ray image and the corresponding correct label indicating whether retaking is necessary are required. However, chest X-ray images cannot distinguish whether inspiration is sufficient and does not need to be retaken, or insufficient and retaking is required. Therefore, we generated input images and labels from dynamic digital radiography (DDR) and conducted the training. Verification using 18 dynamic chest X-ray cases (5400 images) and 48 actual chest X-ray cases (96 images) showed that the VGG16-based architecture achieved an assessment accuracy of 82.3% even for actual chest X-ray images. Therefore, if the proposed method is used in hospitals, it could possibly reduce the variability in judgment between operators.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedInhalationRadiography, ThoracicHumansNeural Networks, ComputerChest X-rayConvolutional neural networkDynamic digital radiographyInspiration stateRetaking assessment

Identifiers

PMID39969765
PMCPMC12103368

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.