Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969778›Full record

ReviewDrugs2025

Treatment of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis in the Oldest Old.

Nicholas Fuggle, Andrea Laslop, René Rizzoli, Nasser Al-Daghri, Majed Alokail, Ewa Balkowiec-Iskra, Charlotte Beaudart, Olivier Bruyère, Angie Botto-van Bemden, Nansa Burlet and 28 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The gut-bone-inflammation axis: intestinal barrier disruption as a central driver of osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors.

Nicholas FuggleMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Andrea LaslopScientific Office, Austrian Medicines and Medical Devices Agency, Vienna, Austria.
René RizzoliDivision of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nasser Al-DaghriChair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Majed AlokailProtein Research Chair, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ewa Balkowiec-IskraDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Charlotte BeaudartClinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Research Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, NARILIS, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Olivier BruyèreResearch Unit in Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Angie Botto-van BemdenMusculoskeletal Research International, Inc., Boston, USA.
Nansa BurletThe European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO), Liege, Belgium.
Etienne CavalierDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, CIRM, University of Liège, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Francesca CerretaEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Manju ChandranOsteoporosis and Bone Metabolism Unit, Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Antonio CherubiniGeriatria, Accettazione geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Mario Miguel Coelho da Silva RosaFaculdade de Medicina, Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Philip ConaghanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Bernard CortetDepartment of Rheumatology, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Alfonso Cruz JentoftServicio de Geriatría. Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYIS), Madrid, Spain.
Elizabeth M CurtisMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Patrizia D'AmelioDepartment of Geriatrics and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bess Dawson-HughesJean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Elaine M DennisonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Mickaël HiligsmannDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jean-Marc KaufmanDepartment of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Stefania MaggiCNR Aging Branch-IN, Padua, Italy.
Radmila MatijevicFaculty of Medicine, Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Clinical Center of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Eugene McCloskeyDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Daniel MessinaIRO Investigaciones Reumatologicas y Osteologicas SRL Collaborating Centre WHO, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniel PintoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Maria Concepcion Prieto YerroAgencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios, Madrid, Spain.
Régis Pierre RadermeckerDepartment of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic disorders, Clinical pharmacology, University of Liège, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Yves RollandIHU Health Age, CHU Toulouse, INSERM 1295, Toulouse, France.
Carla TorreFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal.
Nicola VeroneseChair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
John A KanisDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Jean-Yves Reginster *Protein Research Chair, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nicholas C Harvey *MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. nch@mrc.soton.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis and osteoarthritis are key diseases of musculoskeletal ageing and are increasing in prevalence and burden with the progressively ageing population worldwide. These conditions are thus particularly common in 'the oldest old', and there are complexities of managing them within the context of extensive multimorbidity, physical and mental disability, and polypharmacy, the rates for all of which are high in this population. In this narrative review, we explore the epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis in the oldest old before examining trials and real-world data relating to the pharmacological treatment of these diseases in older adults, including anti-resorptives and bone-forming agents in osteoporosis and symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis, paracetamol, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritis, recognising that the oldest old are usually excluded from clinical trials. We then review the potential benefits of nutritional interventions and exercise therapy before highlighting the health economic benefits of interventions for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. The high prevalence of risk factors for both disease and adverse events associated with treatment in the oldest old mean that careful attention must be paid to the potential benefits of intervention (including fracture risk reduction and improvements in osteoarthritis pain and function) versus the potential harms and adverse effects. Further direct evidence relating to such interventions is urgently needed from future research.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoarthritisOsteoporosisAged, 80 and overAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHumansRisk FactorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID39969778
PMCPMC11891106

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.