Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969980›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Julia Martínez-Alfonso, Fernando Sebastian-Valles, Vicente Martinez-Vizcaino, Nuria Jimenez-Olivas, Antonio Cabrera-Majada, Iván De Los Mozos-Hernando, Shkelzen Cekrezi, Héctor Martínez-Martínez, Arthur Eumann Mesas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julia Martínez-AlfonsoCentro de Salud Daroca, Departamento de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Salud Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8241-0537
Fernando Sebastian-VallesDepartamento de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-0483
Vicente Martinez-VizcainoCentro de estudios sociosanitarios, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6121-7893
Nuria Jimenez-OlivasCentro de Salud Daroca, Departamento de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Salud Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5822-4822
Antonio Cabrera-MajadaCentro de Salud Daroca, Departamento de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Salud Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0165-2815
Iván De Los Mozos-HernandoCentro de Salud Daroca, Departamento de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Salud Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0009-2507-4755
Shkelzen CekreziCentro de estudios sociosanitarios, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0009-0003-5016-3529
Héctor Martínez-MartínezCentro de estudios sociosanitarios, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-3991-3593
Arthur Eumann MesasCentro de estudios sociosanitarios, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0088-8607

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial determinants of health (SDH) have been shown to be predictors of health outcomes. Integrating SDH screening tools into primary care may help identify individuals or groups with a greater burden of social vulnerability and promote health equity.

objectiveThis study aimed (1) to identify the existing screening tools to assess social deprivation in adults in primary care settings; (2) to describe the characteristics of these tools and, where appropriate, their psychometric properties; (3) to describe their validity and reliability in those scales in which validation processes have been conducted; and (4) to identify evidence gaps and provide recommendations for future research.

methodsThis study protocol was structured according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Furthermore, since not all SDH assessment tools are published as scientific papers, we will use a slightly modified form of the scoping review framework to retrieve specific information about specific tools for screening SDH in primary care contexts. The following electronic databases will be searched by 2 reviewers: MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and Scopus. In addition, the following sources will also be searched for gray literature: DART-Europe E-thesis Portal, OpenGrey, and Google Scholar. After the revision of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the titles, abstracts, and full text of the included studies will be separately screened by 2 reviewers. A PRISMA-ScR flowchart will be used to depict the sources of evidence screened, and data charting will be used to gain in-depth knowledge. The findings of the scoping review will be presented in both narrative and tabular formats, summarizing the existing literature on tools used for SDH in primary care settings. A critical analysis will be undertaken to address the variability in tool validation, cultural adaptability, and integration into different health care systems. Finally, key gaps in the existing evidence will be explored, and research priorities will be proposed, emphasizing the need for screening tools that are culturally sensitive, scalable, and easily integrated into primary care workflows. This critically appraised information may be useful for implementing SDH screening tools in primary care settings and may contribute to future research addressing feasibility and validation studies in different primary health care systems.

resultsThe study began in July 2024. Data collection is expected to be completed in April 2025, with publication expected in October 2025.

conclusionsThis scoping review will provide a comprehensive and critical description of the available tools aimed at screening SDH in primary care settings. Incorporating these tools into routine care has been recognized as a key strategy for addressing health inequalities, given the growing evidence base on the influence of SDH on health outcomes. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/68668.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPrimary Health CareSocial Determinants of HealthAdultHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicprimary health carescreeningsocial deprivationsocial determinants of healthsocial inequality

Identifiers

PMID39969980
PMCPMC11888013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.