ArticleThe plant genome2025
Genomic and phenomic prediction for soybean seed yield, protein, and oil.
Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photosynthesis-informed breeding to enhance Soybean (Glycine max) yield potential: a framework integrating high-throughput phenomics, genomic prediction and G×E×M.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- Harnessing high-throughput phenotyping and artificial intelligence for soybean breeding: From trait assessment to data-driven decisions.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Integrative genomics and zero-shot deep learning-based phenotyping reveal the genetic architecture of seed traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.).The plant genome · 2026Article
- Image-based high-throughput phenotyping enables genetic analyses of pod morphological traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Enhancing genomic prediction accuracy in Huaxi cattle through integration of transcriptomic data and a self-attention-based SNP selection strategy.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Phenotypic and genetic dissection of seed shape related traits in soybean (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Transformer model to determine spatio-temporal relationships of variables, and interpretability for soybean seed yield, oil, and protein prediction.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Article
- QTL-seq analysis of seed protein quantity and quality traits in two soybean recombinant inbred line populations.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Genomic and phenomic prediction for soybean seed yield, protein, and oil.The plant genome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developments in genomics and phenomics have provided valuable tools for use in cultivar development. Genomic prediction (GP) has been used in commercial soybean [Glycine max L. (Merr.)] breeding programs to predict grain yield and seed composition traits. Phenomic prediction (PP) is a rapidly developing field that holds the potential to be used for the selection of genotypes early in the growing season. The objectives of this study were to compare the performance of GP and PP for predicting soybean seed yield, protein, and oil. We additionally conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the traits of interest. The GWAS panel of 292 diverse accessions was grown in six environments in replicated trials. Spectral data were collected at two time points during the growing season. A genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model was trained on 269 accessions, while three separate machine learning (ML) models were trained on vegetation indices (VIs) and canopy traits. We observed that PP had a higher correlation coefficient than GP for seed yield, while GP had higher correlation coefficients for seed protein and oil contents. VIs with high feature importance were used as covariates in a new GBLUP model, and a new random forest model was trained with the inclusion of selected SNPs. These models did not outperform the original GP and PP models. These results show the capability of using ML for in-season predictions for specific traits in soybean breeding and provide insights on PP and GP inclusions in breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.