Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39972529›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2025

Genomic and phenomic prediction for soybean seed yield, protein, and oil.

Liza Van der Laan, Kyle Parmley, Mojdeh Saadati, Hernan Torres Pacin, Srikanth Panthulugiri, Soumik Sarkar, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Aaron Lorenz, Asheesh K Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liza Van der LaanDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6282-8028
Kyle ParmleyDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Mojdeh SaadatiDepartment of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9092-8464
Hernan Torres PacinDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4177-9344
Srikanth PanthulugiriDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4817-6976
Soumik SarkarDepartment of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-9199
Baskar GanapathysubramanianDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8931-4852
Aaron LorenzDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-1683
Asheesh K SinghDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7522-037X

Funding

G.F. Sprague Chair in Agronomy at Iowa State UniversityIowa Soybean AssociationNational Institute of Food and Agriculture USDA-NIFA #2021-67021-35329National Science Foundation CPS Frontier #1954556National Science Foundation NSF S&CC #1952045Plant Sciences Institute, Iowa State UniversityRaymond F. Baker Center for Plant BreedingUnited Soybean BoardUSDA CRIS project IOW04714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developments in genomics and phenomics have provided valuable tools for use in cultivar development. Genomic prediction (GP) has been used in commercial soybean [Glycine max L. (Merr.)] breeding programs to predict grain yield and seed composition traits. Phenomic prediction (PP) is a rapidly developing field that holds the potential to be used for the selection of genotypes early in the growing season. The objectives of this study were to compare the performance of GP and PP for predicting soybean seed yield, protein, and oil. We additionally conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the traits of interest. The GWAS panel of 292 diverse accessions was grown in six environments in replicated trials. Spectral data were collected at two time points during the growing season. A genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model was trained on 269 accessions, while three separate machine learning (ML) models were trained on vegetation indices (VIs) and canopy traits. We observed that PP had a higher correlation coefficient than GP for seed yield, while GP had higher correlation coefficients for seed protein and oil contents. VIs with high feature importance were used as covariates in a new GBLUP model, and a new random forest model was trained with the inclusion of selected SNPs. These models did not outperform the original GP and PP models. These results show the capability of using ML for in-season predictions for specific traits in soybean breeding and provide insights on PP and GP inclusions in breeding programs.

Indexed as

Glycine maxPhenomicsPlant OilsPlant ProteinsSeedsGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsGenotypeMachine LearningPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePlant OilsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39972529
PMCPMC11839941

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.