Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39973316›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

Endovascular flow diversion reconstruction of petrocervical dissections with the proximal anchoring technique: Experience in 31 consecutive cases.

Jessica K Campos, Benjamen M Meyer, Fahad J Laghari, David A Zarrin, Muhammad W Khan, Jonathan Collard de Beaufort, Gizal Amin, Ashish Ramesh, Narlin B Beaty, Matthew T Bender and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jessica K CamposDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1075-0764
Benjamen M MeyerCollege of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5773-1619
Fahad J LaghariCarondelet Neurological Institute, St Joseph's Hospital, Tucson, AZ, USA.
David A ZarrinDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Muhammad W KhanCarondelet Neurological Institute, St Joseph's Hospital, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Jonathan Collard de BeaufortCollege of Arts and Sciences, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Gizal AminCarondelet Neurological Institute, St Joseph's Hospital, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Ashish RameshDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
Narlin B BeatyTallahassee Memorial Hospital, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Matthew T BenderDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Shuichi SuzukiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
Geoffrey P ColbyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alexander L CoonCarondelet Neurological Institute, St Joseph's Hospital, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFlow diverting stents (FDS) are routinely used to reconstruct the arteries of the head and neck. When placed into the mobile cervical internal carotid artery (cICA) segment, the FDS runs the risk of post-procedure stent migration and proximal intimal hyperplasia reaction from physiologic movement of the neck. We report our experience using a novel proximal anchoring technique during endovascular flow reconstruction of complex petrocervical dissections to prevent this potentially deleterious result.

methodsWe reviewed a prospectively maintained IRB-approved institutional database of the senior authors to identify cases of FDS treatment in the mobile petrocervical segments which had the proximal FDS "anchored" with a nitinol stent.

resultsThe proximal anchoring technique was successfully performed in the mobile cervical segment in a total of 31 cases over the study period. Each case involved a complex ICA dissection with 68% (n = 21) having an accompanying pseudoaneurysm. Fifty-two percent (n = 16) were female. Surpass Streamline and Evolve FDS were utilized in all cases. An average of 2.2 ± 0.1 FDS devices were utilized (range 2-4 FDS), with each case utilizing a laser-cut nitinol carotid stent as the proximal anchor. The average stent diameter was 5.64 ± 0.2 mm (range 4-8 mm) and length of 30.1 ± 1.5 mm (range 20-60 mm). On last follow-up angiography, there were no instances of stent migration or proximal neointimal hyperplasia.

conclusionUtilization of the proximal anchoring technique on FDS constructs in the mobile cICA may provide additional protection from post-procedure stent migration and intimal reaction attributed to patient neck movement resulting in augmentation of successful healing.

Indexed as

cervicalDissectionflow diverterstenttechnique

Identifiers

PMID39973316
PMCPMC11840814

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.