Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975317›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

NMR Spectroscopy for the Validation of AlphaFold2 Structures.

Jake Williams, Isabelle A Gagnon, Joseph R Sachleben

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jake WilliamsDepartment of Computer Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-9714-1851
Isabelle A GagnonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Joseph R SachlebenBiomolecular NMR Facility, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-2018-1326

Funding

Kinetic studies of protein foldingR01GM055694 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOSNICK, TOBIN R · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
FOLDING OF AN ALPHA-HELICAL COILED COILR29GM055694 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOSNICK, TOBIN R · 1996 to 2000
$107k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM055694NIGMS NIH HHS R29 GM055694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of AlphaFold has fundamentally changed our ability to predict the structure of proteins from their primary sequence of amino acids. As machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) based protein prediction continues to advance, we examine the potential of hybrid techniques that combine experiment and computation that may yield more accurate structures than AI alone with significantly reduced experimental burden. We have developed heuristics comparing N-edited NOESY spectra and AlphaFold predicted structures that seek to determine whether the predicted structure reasonably describes the structure of the protein which generated the NOESY. We present a large collection of data connecting entries across the BMRB, PDB and AlphaFold Database that includes experimentally derived structures and corresponding spectra, establishing it as a means to develop and test hybrid methods utilizing AlphaFold and NMR spectra to perform structure determination. These data test the new heuristics' ability to identify inaccurate AlphaFold structures. A support vector machine was developed to test the consistency of NMR data with predicted structure and we show its application to the structure of an unsolved engineered protein, LoTOP.

Indexed as

AlphaFoldArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningNMR spectroscopyNOESYSPANRstructure validation

Identifiers

PMID39975317
PMCPMC11838581

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.