Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39975595›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Preclinical research models for endometrial cancer: development and selection of animal models.

Yang Xue, Wei Shi, Bing Lun, Meilin Kan, Mengling Jia, Yuelin Wu, Li Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yang XueDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wei ShiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Bing LunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Meilin KanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Mengling JiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuelin WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Li YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries, with rising incidence in recent years. Experimental animal models are crucial for studying the pathogenesis, advancing diagnostic methods, and developing new treatments. We review five main EC animal models. The use of spontaneous and chemically-induced models has decreased, with transgenic mouse and xenograft models becoming the most widely used. These models better simulate tumor molecular mechanisms and treatments, with the organoid-based patient-derived xenograft model (O-PDX) showing great promise in drug screening and personalized therapy. The application of humanized models remains limited due to technical challenges and high costs. In this review, we highlight the strengths and limitations of each model to guide researchers in their selection.

Indexed as

animal modelendometrial cancerhumanized modelorganoidpatient-derived xenograft modelpreclinical research

Identifiers

PMID39975595
PMCPMC11835666

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.