SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Heart disease in pregnancy and adverse outcomes: an umbrella review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between maternal thyroid function and adverse outcomes of pregnant women and offspring: evidence from an umbrella review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart disease in pregnancy encompasses both congenital heart disease and maternal-acquired heart disease, both of which are associated with an increased risk of various adverse outcomes for mothers and their offspring. Objective: The objective of the study was to review and summarize the evidence regarding the association between heart disease in pregnancy and adverse outcomes in mothers and their offspring. Data sources: A comprehensive search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to March 2024. The protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024519144). Study eligibility criteria: This review included systematic reviews and meta-analyses that examined the association between heart disease in pregnancy and adverse outcomes for mothers and their offspring. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Data were independently extracted by two reviewers. The quality of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2), while Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the strength of the evidence for each outcome. Results: A total of 12 meta-analyses and systematic reviews were included, which documented 156 adverse outcomes for mothers and 65 adverse outcomes for offspring. Evidence was found for both primary and secondary adverse outcomes. Adverse outcomes for mothers were death, cardiac events (cardiac arrest, heart failure, surgery, arrhythmia, anesthesia or sedation, endocarditis, mitral regurgitation, myocardial infarction, NYHA III-IV, restenosis, syncope, and others), pulmonary events (respiratory failure, pulmonary edema, and respiratory support), embolism, cerebrovascular events, postpartum hemorrhage, arterial events, delivery mode, and hospital stay. Adverse outcomes for offspring were death, pregnancy loss, growth restriction, low birth weight, preterm birth, recurrence, and uncertainty. No publication bias was detected using Egger's test. The overall AMSTAR 2 confidence rating for the included meta-analyses and systematic reviews was moderate. The majority (55.3%) of the evidence evaluated by GRADE was of low quality, while the remaining outcomes were categorized as having "very low"-quality evidence. Conclusion: Current evidence links heart disease during pregnancy to adverse maternal outcomes, including death and cardiac, pulmonary, and cerebrovascular events, as well as increased mortality risk for offspring. Many meta-analyses in this field have limitations that raise concerns about their validity, highlighting the need for high-quality prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.