ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
CSGDN: contrastive signed graph diffusion network for predicting crop gene-phenotype associations.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- GiGCN: a network-based framework for uncovering synthetic lethal and viable genetic interactions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Integrating deep learning and pangenomics to recover missing heritability from wild structural variations.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- A Scalable Sign-Aware Multi-Omics Knowledge Graph Foundation Model for Mechanistic Drug Action and Clinical Response Predictions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Therapeutic Potential of Cyclic Peptide-Based Nanocarriers for Enhanced Colon Cancer Treatment.The protein journal · 2025Review
- A Narrative Review on the Role of Microbiota and Microglia in Premotor Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease.Neurotoxicity research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Positive and negative association prediction between gene and phenotype helps to illustrate the underlying mechanism of complex traits in organisms. The transcription and regulation activity of specific genes will be adjusted accordingly in different cell types, developmental timepoints, and physiological states. There are the following two problems in obtaining the positive/negative associations between gene and phenotype: (1) high-throughput DNA/RNA sequencing and phenotyping are expensive and time-consuming due to the need to process large sample sizes; (2) experiments introduce both random and systematic errors, and, meanwhile, calculations or predictions using software or models may produce noise. To address these two issues, we propose a Contrastive Signed Graph Diffusion Network, CSGDN, to learn robust node representations with fewer training samples to achieve higher link prediction accuracy. CSGDN uses a signed graph diffusion method to uncover the underlying regulatory associations between genes and phenotypes. Then, stochastic perturbation strategies are used to create two views for both original and diffusive graphs. Lastly, a multiview contrastive learning paradigm loss is designed to unify the node presentations learned from the two views to resist interference and reduce noise. We perform experiments to validate the performance of CSGDN in three crop datasets: Gossypium hirsutum, Brassica napus, and Triticum turgidum. The results show that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art methods by up to 9. 28% AUC for the prediction of link sign in the G. hirsutum dataset. The source code of our model is available at https://github.com/Erican-Ji/CSGDN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.