ArticleNeurogenetics2025
Predicting high-risk clinical missense variants of SMARCB1 in rare neurogenetic disorder schwannomatosis (nerve tumor) through sequence, structure, and molecular dynamics analyses.
Article in Neurogenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The SMARCB1 gene codes for a key element of the SWI/SNF chromatin-modifying complex, which plays a vital role in controlling gene expression by modifying chromatin architecture. Alterations in SMARCB1 have been linked to several neurological disabilities, including schwannomatosis, a condition marked by the formation of numerous benign tumors affecting the nerve sheaths. Present study explore the effects of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) within the SMARCB1 gene on its protein structure and functionality. We utilized both sequence-based and structure-oriented predictive models, followed by molecular dynamics simulations to examine their influence on the stability of protein and dynamic behaviour. The study focused on three key mutations: R60S, R190W, and I237M. The R190W mutation emerged as particularly significant, leading to increased protein compactness and stability due to enhanced hydrophobic interactions, although conformational flexibility was reduced. The R60S mutation was associated with destabilization of the protein structure, increasing solvent exposure and reducing hydrogen bond stability, potentially impairing the protein's function. The I237M mutation had a relatively mild impact, with only subtle changes observed in protein dynamics. These findings highlight the diverse impacts of different nsSNPs on SMARCB1, with the potential to contribute to various pathologies, including Schwannomatosis and other related disorders. This study highlights the necessity for additional experimental testing to confirm these computational findings and gain a deeper understanding of the molecular processes through which these mutations contribute to disease. The present comprehensive approach provides significant knowledge regarding the connection between SMARCB1 structure and function, providing the groundwork for potential therapeutic strategies targeting these key mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39976804What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.