Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39976902›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025

Genomic and In Vitro Analysis of Pediococcus pentosaceus MBBL4 Implicated Its Therapeutic Use Against Mastitis Pathogens and as a Potential Probiotic.

Md Morshedur Rahman, Naim Siddique, Md Abu Ahsan Gilman, Soharth Hasnat, Md Golam Haider, Md Morshedur Rahman, Anup Kumar Talukder, Abu Nasar Md Aminoor Rahman, Tofazzal Islam, Ziban Chandra Das and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Draft genome sequencing of anMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Md Morshedur RahmanMolecular Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh.
Naim SiddiqueMolecular Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh.
Md Abu Ahsan GilmanMolecular Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh.
Soharth HasnatMolecular Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh.
Md Golam HaiderDepartment of Pathobiology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh.
Md Morshedur RahmanDepartment of Dairy and Poultry Science, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh.
Anup Kumar TalukderMolecular Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh.
Abu Nasar Md Aminoor RahmanMolecular Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh.
Tofazzal IslamInstitute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh.
Ziban Chandra DasMolecular Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh.
M Anwar HossainDepartment of Microbiology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.
M Nazmul HoqueMolecular Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh. nazmul90@bsmrau.edu.bd.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediococcus pentosaceus has the potential to be used as probiotics and biologics amid rising trends of global antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and non-communicable diseases. This study analyzed the genome of P. pentosaceus MBBL4, isolated from healthy cow milk, to assess its probiotic properties and antimicrobial efficacy. The strain was subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS), assembly, and annotations, alongside phylogenetic and comparative genomic analyses. Additionally, carbohydrate utilization, metabolic pathways, genomic safety, and probiotic potential of MBBL4 were assessed. Its in vitro antimicrobial efficacy against mastitis pathogens was also evaluated. The WGS analysis uncovered many important probiotic traits in MBBL4. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated a close genetic link with other 15 P. pentosaceus strains, sharing more than 99% of core genes within the pan-genome matrix. MBBL4 demonstrated extensive range of carbohydrate metabolism activity, supported by the presence of several genes encoded enzymes, including a complete elucidated lactose metabolism pathway along with 28 additional metabolic pathway modules. Notably, its genome contains regions associated with gallic acid metabolism and related genes. MBBL4 also harbored genes encoding immunity proteins like enterocin A and lactococcin, and antimicrobial compounds including penocin A, lysozymes, laccase, colicin V, and viguiepinol. Comparative analysis with other probiotic strains revealed seven novel exopolysaccharide biosynthesis proteins and one biofilm-related protein. Moreover, MBBL4 remained sensitive to 90% of the tested antibiotics and carried only a single lincosamide resistance gene (lnuA). It effectively inhibited the growth of two important bovine mastitis pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus D4C4 and Escherichia coli G1C5. These results, along with its low pathogenicity score, support the safety profile of MBBL4 and highlight its potential as bioactive natural therapeutic for mastitis and a promising probiotic candidate.

Indexed as

MilkPediococcus pentosaceusProbioticsAnimalsCattleFemaleGenome, BacterialMastitis, BovinePhylogenyBacteriocinsCow milkLactose metabolismPediococcus pentosaceusProbiotics

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.