ArticlePloS one2025
Proteomic associations with cognitive variability as measured by the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in a healthy Thai population: A machine learning approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inter-individual cognitive variability, influenced by genetic and environmental factors, is crucial for understanding typical cognition and identifying early cognitive disorders. This study investigated the association between serum protein expression profiles and cognitive variability in a healthy Thai population using machine learning algorithms. We included 199 subjects, aged 20 to 70, and measured cognitive performance with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified using label-free proteomics and analyzed with the Linear Model for Microarray Data. We discovered 213 DEPs between lower and higher cognition groups, with 155 upregulated in the lower cognition group and enriched in the IL-17 signaling pathway. Subsequent bioinformatic analysis linked these DEPs to neuroinflammation-related cognitive impairment. A random forest model classified cognitive ability groups with an accuracy of 81.5%, sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 85.9%, and an AUC of 0.79. By targeting a specific Thai cohort, this research provides novel insights into the link between neuroinflammation and cognitive performance, advancing our understanding of cognitive variability, highlighting the role of biological markers in cognitive function, and contributing to developing more accurate machine learning models for diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.