Evidence mapPaperPMID 39977445Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Microbial effects of cold-pressed Sacha inchi oil supplementation in rats.

Tepparit Samrit, Supawadee Osotprasit, Athit Chaiwichien, Phawiya Suksomboon, Supanan Chansap, Thitikul Suthisintong, Narin Changklungmoa, Pornanan Kueakhai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anticancer Effects of Sacha Inchi (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tepparit SamritFood Bioactive Compounds Research Unit and Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Supawadee OsotprasitFood Bioactive Compounds Research Unit and Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Athit ChaiwichienFood Bioactive Compounds Research Unit and Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Phawiya SuksomboonFood Bioactive Compounds Research Unit and Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Supanan ChansapFood Bioactive Compounds Research Unit and Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Thitikul SuthisintongFood Bioactive Compounds Research Unit and Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Narin ChangklungmoaFood Bioactive Compounds Research Unit and Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Pornanan KueakhaiFood Bioactive Compounds Research Unit and Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4229-0803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oil supplements have various benefits for metabolism, particularly Sacha inchi oil (SI), which is rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) such as ω-3 and fat-soluble vitamins. However, the impacts of oil supplements on gut health remain unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of an SI supplement with those of lard oil (LO), known for its high saturated fatty acid content, and a normal diet on gut health in male Sprague Dawley rats for 12 consecutive weeks. Fecal DNA was used to assess gut microbiota diversity and species abundance, diversity, and function prediction. Colon tissue from each rat was examined for colon crypt depth and histology. Rats administered the LO supplement exhibited higher dysbiosis than those administered the SI supplement, with the LO supplement influencing the relative abundance of various bacteria at the genus level. A KEGG analysis was conducted to examine the effects on metabolic pathways, revealing that the SI supplement promoted carbohydrate metabolism while reducing immune system activity. In contrast, the LO supplement increased replication, repair, and translation activities. A histological analysis of the colon tissues showed no significant alterations in crypt depth or lesions in all groups, indicating that neither supplement induced adverse structural changes in the gut. The results of this study suggest that SI supplementation modulates the gut microbiota, thereby enhancing gut health and metabolic function.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsGastrointestinal MicrobiomePlant OilsAnimalsBacteriaColonDysbiosisFecesMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyPlant Oils

Identifiers

PMID39977445
PMCPMC11841868

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.