ArticleJournal of global health2025
The treatment responses among different inhalation therapies for GOLD group E patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for future exacerbations in patients with COPD treated with dual LABA/LAMA.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Moderate and Severe Exacerbations and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Chinese Patients with COPD on Triple Therapy: A Retrospective Database Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- The effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on symptom change and exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomised controlled trial.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- The clinical characteristics and prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with anorexia.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Application of GOLD 2023 Initial Inhalation Therapy Recommendations in COPD patients: a real-world adherence and prognosis analysis.Journal of global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2023 revised the combined chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment, merging groups C and D into group E, and revised the initial inhalation therapy recommendation. We aimed to evaluate the treatment responses among different inhalation therapies in GOLD group E patients stratified by the COPD assessment test (CAT) scores and forced expiratory volume in one-second percentage of predicted (FEV1%pred). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with COPD registered in the Real World Research of Diagnosis and Treatment of COPD (RealDTC) study between January 2017 and June 2023. According to the GOLD 2023 report, we enrolled patients assigned to GOLD group E based on exacerbations in the past year (≥2 exacerbations or ≥1 hospitalisation) in this study. We classified them into the FEV1%pred <50% and FEV1%pred ≥50% groups, or CAT<10 and CAT≥10 groups. Subsequently, we divided all groups into four subgroups: long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) + inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), LABA + LAMA, and LABA + LAMA + ICS. All patients finished one year of follow-up, during which we collected data on exacerbations, frequent exacerbations, hospitalisations, and all-cause mortality. We defined frequent exacerbations as ≥2 exacerbations per year. Results: We enrolled a total of 3173 patients in this study. During one year of follow-up, there were no significant differences in exacerbations, frequent exacerbations, hospitalisations, and all-cause mortality among LAMA, LABA + LAMA, LABA + ICS, and LABA + LAMA + ICS in the FEV1%pred ≥50% and CAT<10 groups. However, the patients treated with LABA + LAMA or LABA + LAMA + ICS had a lower incidence of exacerbations and frequent exacerbations compared with the patients treated with LAMA or LABA + ICS in the FEV1%pred <50% and CAT≥10 groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with COPD in GOLD group E should be further stratified to determine the appropriate initial inhalation therapy. This approach may provide more precise treatment for GOLD group E patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.