Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39978337›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2025

The hidden bacterial microproteome.

Igor Fesenko, Harutyun Sahakyan, Rajat Dhyani, Svetlana A Shabalina, Gisela Storz, Eugene V Koonin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Emergence Biases in Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Sketching microprotein portraits.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Imported, not invented, genes prevail amongProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Something from nothing: The birth of new phage defense genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. De Novo Genes: Current Status and Future Goals.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Chasing the Ghost Proteome in the Dark Matter.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Igor FesenkoComputational Biology Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Harutyun SahakyanComputational Biology Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Rajat DhyaniDivision of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Svetlana A ShabalinaComputational Biology Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Gisela StorzDivision of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: storzg@mail.nih.gov.
Eugene V KooninComputational Biology Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. Electronic address: koonin@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Funding

Small Regulatory ProteinsZIAHD008855 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI STORZ, GISELA · 2009 to 2025
$16.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD008855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microproteins encoded by small open reading frames comprise the "dark matter" of proteomes. Although microproteins have been detected in diverse organisms from all three domains of life, many more remain to be identified, and only a few have been functionally characterized. In this comprehensive study of intergenic small open reading frames (ismORFs, 15-70 codons) in 5,668 bacterial genomes of the family Enterobacteriaceae, we identify 67,297 clusters of ismORFs subject to purifying selection. Expression of tagged Escherichia coli microproteins is detected for 11 of the 16 tested, validating the predictions. Although the ismORFs mainly code for hydrophobic, potentially transmembrane, unstructured, or minimally structured microproteins, some globular folds, oligomeric structures, and possible interactions with proteins encoded by neighboring genes are predicted. Complete information on the predicted microprotein families, including evidence of transcription and translation, and structure predictions are available as an easily searchable resource for investigation of microprotein functions.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsEnterobacteriaceaeGenome, BacterialOpen Reading FramesProteomeEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialProteomicsBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsProteomebacterial microproteinsevolution of microproteinsintergenic regionsprotein structure predictionsmall open reading framessmORFs

Identifiers

PMID39978337
PMCPMC11890958

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.