ArticleCryobiology2025
Is isochoric vitrification feasible? Cycling between modeling, experimental observations, and first principles.
Article in Cryobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Isochoric cryopreservation is preservation of biological material in a constant-volume container, to benefit from a presumed baroprotective effect. From its inception, the premise for the isochoric approach is that pressure elevation can be achieved by permitting some ice formation in the system. The idea of integrating vitrification into an isochoric chamber followed at a later stage, where vitrification is a century old established approach of ice-free cryopreservation. At face value, the resulting term "isochoric vitrification" encompasses an internal contradiction revolving around ice formation. We have previously shared modeling results pointing to this contradiction and, hence, questioning the feasibility of the process (Cryobiology 2023, 111, 9-15). More recently, Ali et al. (Cryobiology 2024, 116, 104935) claimed to have obtained contradictory experimental evidence while stating that isochoric vitrification is feasible. The objective for this communication is to share our skepticism about this claim with the community of cryobiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.