Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39978433›Full record

ArticleCryobiology2025

Is isochoric vitrification feasible? Cycling between modeling, experimental observations, and first principles.

Yoed Rabin, Prem K Solanki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cryobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yoed RabinBiothermal Technology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. Electronic address: rabin@cmu.edu.
Prem K SolankiBiothermal Technology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

Funding

Developing pressure-modulated means for high-subzero liver preservationR01DK136805 · NIDDK · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI YOED RABIN · 2024 to 2026
$965k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK136805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isochoric cryopreservation is preservation of biological material in a constant-volume container, to benefit from a presumed baroprotective effect. From its inception, the premise for the isochoric approach is that pressure elevation can be achieved by permitting some ice formation in the system. The idea of integrating vitrification into an isochoric chamber followed at a later stage, where vitrification is a century old established approach of ice-free cryopreservation. At face value, the resulting term "isochoric vitrification" encompasses an internal contradiction revolving around ice formation. We have previously shared modeling results pointing to this contradiction and, hence, questioning the feasibility of the process (Cryobiology 2023, 111, 9-15). More recently, Ali et al. (Cryobiology 2024, 116, 104935) claimed to have obtained contradictory experimental evidence while stating that isochoric vitrification is feasible. The objective for this communication is to share our skepticism about this claim with the community of cryobiology.

Indexed as

CryopreservationVitrificationAnimalsCryoprotective AgentsHumansIcePressureCryoprotective AgentsIceExperimental interpretationFirst principlesIsochoric preservationModelingSkepticismTerminologyVitrification

Identifiers

PMID39978433
PMCPMC12970382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.