ArticleBMJ open2025
Effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on postoperative delirium in older patients with hip fracture: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Current Evidence and Future Directions.NeuroSci · 2026Review
- Perioperative neurocognitive disorders: a comprehensive review of terminology, clinical implications, and future research directions.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Clinical advances in transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for post-stroke disorders: state of the art and future perspectives.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative delirium (POD) is an acute neurocognitive impairment and is commonly observed in older patients with hip fractures. POD is associated with poor outcomes, including increased postoperative complications, prolonged hospitalisation, high costs and increased perioperative mortality. Therefore, reducing the occurrence of POD and improving cognitive abilities in older patients are critical and urgent. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (TAVNS) is a simple, safe, non-invasive treatment and has great potential to improve cognitive function. This clinical study will evaluate the effectiveness of TAVNS in reducing the incidence of POD in older patients and further elucidate the possible underlying mechanisms. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised, double-blind, single-centre controlled trial will enroll 154 older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, who will be randomly assigned to the TAVNS group (n=77), receiving TAVNS from 1 hour before anaesthetic induction to the end of the surgery, or the sham stimulation group (n=77), receiving sham stimulation in the same manner. The primary outcome measure will be the incidence of POD during the first 7 days post-surgery, as assessed by the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit. The secondary outcomes include the incidence of delayed neurocognitive recovery; serum acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase levels; the concentrations of tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6 and S100β; unplanned intensive care unit admission rates; the length and cost of hospital stay; the incidence of postoperative complications during hospitalisation; and mortality at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital on 15 May 2024 (2024-KY-HY-13). The findings will be published in the international peer-reviewed academic journals and presented orally at academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2400085508.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.