Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979424›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of red blood cell transfusion in massive burn: a multicenter cohort study.

Yong Du, Yilan Xia, Chuanggang You, Yiran Wang, Deqing Duan, Wanting Xu, Qinglian Xu, Hongyan Zhang, Chunmao Han

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yong DuDepartment of nursing , Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Rd, Hangzhou, China. 2520038@zju.edu.cn.
Yilan XiaDepartment of nursing , Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Rd, Hangzhou, China. 2202088@zju.edu.cn.
Chuanggang YouDepartment of burn and wound care center, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yiran WangDepartment of burn and wound care center, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Deqing DuanDepartment of Burns, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Wanting XuDepartment of Burn Injury, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Qinglian XuDepartment of Burn Injury, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Hongyan ZhangDepartment of Burns, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Chunmao HanDepartment of burn and wound care center, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood transfusions were frequently in massive burn patients, current studies focus on the trigger threshold of red blood cell transfusion, and few studies focus on the impact of red blood cell transfusion volume on patient outcomes. We initiated a multicenter cohort study to explore the impact of red blood cell transfusions volume on patient mortality. 379 patients in three centers were enrolled to the cohort. The extroperative and overall RBC transfusion in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group (p < 0.001), and this difference became insignificant within the operation (p = 0.312). RBC transfusion volume and mortality risk of patients was obviously not linear (p < 0.0001) and would be L-shaped, and the threshold would be 6U. 1:1propensity matching was used to adjust the burn area, full thickness burned area and inhalation injury. There was no significant difference in the outcome and bloodstream infection between the two groups, but the length of stay, length of stay in burn ICU and mechanical ventilation time of the low red blood cell group were significantly lower than those of the high red blood cell group. Our findings therefore support the approach of a restrictive transfusion strategy in severely burned patients. This also confirms the scientificity of restrictive transfusion strategy and suggests that unnecessary red blood cell transfusion should be avoided in clinic.

Indexed as

BurnsErythrocyte TransfusionAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeBurnCohort studyMassive burnRed blood cellTransfusion

Identifiers

PMID39979424
PMCPMC11842838

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.