ArticleAnnals of intensive care2025
[
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Hepatic FDG Avidity From a Migrating Gastric Foreign Body: A PET/CT Pitfall.Clinical nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Determinants of diagnostic yield and scan quality of [Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- [Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in spinal infections: A comprehensive diagnostic tool.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- A scoping review on potential of novel developments in fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin: long-axial-field-of-view positron emission tomography/computed tomography and novel radiotracers.The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of... · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSome ICU patients remain critically ill despite reversal of the original admission diagnosis, driven by a cascade of events resulting in new and persistent organ failure. Secondary infections and systemic inflammation are important components of this cascade and may be visualised using [
methodsWe included patients admitted to the ICU between 2017 and 2024, in whom a [
resultsForty-seven patients with persistent critical illness were included from two university medical centres. The median interval between admission and PET/CT was 21 days (IQR 14-28). In 43 patients (91%) a potential infectious or inflammatory focus was detected, of which 34 (72%) were previously unknown. The [
conclusion[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.