Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2025
Demographic and regional trends in systemic and cardiovascular amyloidosis-related mortality among older adults in the United States from 1999 to 2020.
Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Demographic and regional trends in systemic and cardiovascular amyloidosis-related morality among older adults in the United States from 1999 to 2020: comment.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite therapy advancements, amyloidosis mortality rates for older adults (aged ≥ 65) are rising. This study analyzes trends in amyloidosis-related mortality among older adults in the U.S. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of death certificates from the CDC WONDER database for amyloidosis-related deaths from 1999 to 2020. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 persons and annual percent change (APC) were calculated by age, race/ethnicity, urban-rural classification, and region. From 1999 to 2020, AAMR for amyloidosis in older adults (aged ≥ 65) in the U.S. increased from 2.7 to 5.6. Men consistently had higher AAMRs than women (men: 3.7 vs. women: 2.2 in 1999; men: 8.5 vs. women: 3.5 in 2020). In 2020, Non-Hispanic Blacks had the highest AAMR at 11.8, with an APC of 19.8 (95% CI 10.5-25.5). Regional differences were notable, with AAMRs highest in the Northeast (6.9) and lowest in the South (4.2). Large metropolitan areas had a higher AAMR (6.3) than non-metropolitan areas (4.6). Cardiac amyloidosis accounted for 68.8% of deaths, with AAMR rising from 1.7 to 4.2. There has been a significant increase in AAMRs for amyloidosis in the U.S. from 1999 to 2020, particularly among males, Non-Hispanic Blacks, and those in large metropolitan and Northeast areas. These findings stress the need for enhanced prevention and treatment strategies for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39979755What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.