Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979769›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2025

Implementing motivational interviewing to improve endocrine therapy adherence among breast cancer patients: a qualitative process evaluation of the getset pilot intervention.

Victoria J Dunsmore, Charlotte Ellis, Sarah Drier, Austin R Waters, Niasha Fray, Christina Stylianou, Jennifer C Spencer, Katherine E Reeder-Hayes, Stephanie B Wheeler

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Victoria J DunsmoreLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. vdunsmo@unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5153-5406
Charlotte EllisDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sarah DrierDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Austin R WatersLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Niasha FrayLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Christina StylianouSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jennifer C SpencerDepartment of Population Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Katherine E Reeder-HayesLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Stephanie B WheelerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Cancer Care Quality Training ProgramT32CA116339 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ETHAN M. BASCH, Stephanie Brooke Wheeler · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
Optimizing Endocrine Therapy Adherence through Motivational Interviewing and Text InterventionsR01CA237357 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REEDER-HAYES, KATHERINE E, WHEELER, STEPHANIE BROOKE · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
American Cancer Society MRSG-13-157-01-CPPBNCI NIH HHS R01 CA237357NCI NIH HHS T32 CA116339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluates the implementation of the GETSET (Guiding Endocrine Therapy Success through Empowerment and Teamwork) pilot, a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention aimed at improving endocrine therapy (ET) adherence among patients with breast cancer.

methodsUsing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), qualitative interviews were conducted with site staff (N = 2), patients (N = 4), and counselors (N = 2).

resultsThe thematic analysis identified facilitators such as high-quality materials, ease of scheduling sessions, and effective communication among staff. However, barriers included lack of personalization and systemic issues like understaffing.

conclusionsThe study underscores the need to adapt implementation of behavioral interventions in a healthcare setting to improve ET adherence. As this was a process evaluation of a pilot study, future work should evaluate the barriers and facilitators to a larger clinical trial to identify if the same strategies should be refined.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsMedication AdherenceMotivational InterviewingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalEndocrine therapyInterviewsMedication adherenceProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39979769
PMCPMC12103369

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.