ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Investigating the Anna Karenina principle of the breast microbiome.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Breastfeeding: Protective Effects Against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and the Role of the Breast Microbiota.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A short-term sublethal oral exposure to microcystin-LR disrupts cecal microbiome homeostasis in mallard.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The relationship between the microbiome and disease has long been a central focus of research in human microbiome. Inspired by Leo Tolstoy's dictum, the Anna Karenina Principle (AKP) offers a framework for understanding the complex dynamics of microbial communities in response to perturbations, suggesting that dysbiotic individuals exhibit greater variability/heterogeneity in their microbiome compared to healthy counterparts. While some studies have proved the alignment of microbiome responses to disease with the AKP effect, it remains uncertain whether the human breast microbiome responds similarly to breast disease. This study used beta-diversity and similarity in Hill numbers, along with shared species analysis (SSA), to explore this issue. We observed that during mastitis, changes in both the taxa richness and composition in the breast milk microbiome align with the AKP effect, while alterations in abundant taxa exhibit an anti-AKP effect. The response of breast tissue microbiome to breast cancer differs from that of milk microbiome to mastitis. Breast cancer induce anti-AKP effects in taxa richness, and non-AKP effects in common taxa and taxa composition. Overall, our findings identified different responses to breast diseases across taxa abundance in the breast microbiome. Mastitis primarily involves increasing the heterogeneity of rare taxa in the breast milk microbiome, while breast cancer associates with decreased dispersion of rare taxa in the tissue microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.