Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979931›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Intracranial stenosis prediction using a small set of risk factors in the Tromsø Study.

Luca Bernecker, Liv-Hege Johnsen, Torgil Riise Vangberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luca BerneckerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Liv-Hege JohnsenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Torgil Riise VangbergDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. torgil.vangberg@uit.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) refers to a narrowing of intracranial arteries due to plaque buildup on the inside of the vessel walls restricting blood flow. Early detection of ICAS is crucial to prevent serious consequences such as stroke. Here we apply three different machine learning methods, such as support vector machines, multi-layer perceptrons and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks to predict ICAS according to sparse risk factors from blood lipids and demographic data, including smoking habits, age, sex, diabetes, blood pressure lowering and cholesterol-lowering drugs and high-density lipoprotein. We achieved similar performance on classification compared to modern detection algorithms for ICAS in TOF-MRA (time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography). The prevalence of ICAS in the population is relatively low, which is often case in medicine. While in the medical research community, the issue of low prevalence is established, machine learning-based research in medicine often does not take into account a critical viewpoint of the prevalence in clinical settings of their methods. We showed that with a balanced training/test set an accuracy up to 81% was achievable, while with the inclusion of prevalence, the positive predictive value was at 19% to the prevalence data, changes the performance metrics. Therefore, we highlighted the discrepancy that can arise between the results reported by the models and their clinical relevance. Furthermore, the results demonstrate the predictive potential of limited risk factors, highlighting its potential contribution to a multi-modular classification algorithm based on MRAs.

Indexed as

Intracranial ArteriosclerosisMachine LearningAgedConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedNorwayRisk FactorsArtificial intelligenceIntracranial stenosisMachine learningPredictionPredictive values

Identifiers

PMID39979931
PMCPMC11843764

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.