Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980032›Full record

SynthesisJournal of ovarian research2025

Administration of dehydroepiandrosterone improves endometrial thickness in women undergoing IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ling Huang, Ying Gao, Shuo Liang, Mei Jiang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ling HuangSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Ying GaoDepartment of Acupuncture, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Shuo LiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Mei JiangBeijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.11 Beisanhuandong Road, Chaoyang, Beijing, 100029, P. R. China. jiangmei@bucm.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing University of Chinese Medicine vertical research and development fund 2023-ZXFZJJ-058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe positive effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on oocyte and embryo quality improvement are often concerned. While the results on DHEA-induced endometrial improvement are controversial.

objectiveTo evaluate whether DHEA intervention improved endometrial function and reproductive outcomes during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles and to thus provide clinical recommendations. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science from database inception to 31 July 2024, without language restrictions. The references of conference proceedings and websites on clinical trials were manually checked. STUDY

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Parallel-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) design; women underwent IVF/ICSI, patients in the experimental group received adminstration with DHEA, whereas the control group received with or without placebo; and the outcomes included reproductive or endometrial function. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsRCTs evaluating the effects of DHEA on IVF/ICSI outcomes were included. Risk of bias and quality of evidence (QoE) were assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed by random-effects or fixed-effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to find sources of heterogeneity. Trial sequential analysis was used to judge the stability of the outcomes. Trial sequential analysis was used in order to control for random errors.

resultsA total of 16 trials included 1973 women. DHEA treatment significantly increased endometrial thickness (MD = 0.93, CI: 0.27 to 1.60; low QoE), which helped improve clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.67; low QoE). DHEA administration also increased the quality of oocyte and embryo [including the number of oocytes retrieved (MD = 0.73, CI: 0.36 to 1.10; low QoE), oocytes fertilized (MD = 0.48, CI: 0.10 to 0.87; low QoE), transferred embryos (MD = 0.27, CI: 0.09 to 0.46; very low QoE), and high-quality embryos (MD = 0.65, CI: 0.27 to 1.03; low QoE)]. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses revealed that heterogeneity might be related to disease type, ovarian stimulation protocol, and addition time of DHEA treatment. There was insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion regarding the live birth rate/ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and MII oocyte number of DHEA. And no severe adverse effects were observed with DHEA administration. Due to the apparent improvemen in the CPR, women with thin endometrium might benefit from DHEA cotreament.

conclusionsDue to the limited sample size and methodological problems, the QoE was low to very low; hence, the results should be interpreted with caution. The effectiveness of DHEA requires more research before it can be considered for clinical practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023428885.

Indexed as

DehydroepiandrosteroneEndometriumFertilization in VitroSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateDehydroepiandrosteroneClinical pregnancyDehydroepiandrosteroneEndometrial thicknessIn vitro fertilization/Intracytoplasmic sperm injectionLive birth

Identifiers

PMID39980032
PMCPMC11843996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.