ArticleEchocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)2025
Clinical Outcomes of Intracardiac Echocardiography-Guided Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Intracardiac Echocardiography during Invasive Electrophysiological Procedures: a Scientific Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC, and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions of the ESC.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Guideline
- Safety and efficacy of intracardiac echocardiography in atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: From Patient Selection to Procedural Ablation Guidance.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Left Atrial Intracardiac Echocardiography to Assist Zero Fluoroscopy Pulse Field Atrial Fibrillation Ablation-A Beginner's Guide.CJC open · 2026Article
- Intracardiac Echocardiography-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoutine radiofrequency catheter ablation relies on x-ray imaging, which may increase the risk of radiation exposure to patients. With the rapid development of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) technology, it provides a new guidance modality for radiofrequency catheter ablation and shows great potential for application in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).
objectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of intracardiac echocardiography guided radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of AF.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was used to collect 184 patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of AF from January 2020 to September 2021 in the cardiovascular medicine department of our hospital. According to whether they used ICE or not, they were divided into the ICE group (30 cases) and the non-ICE group (154 cases). The procedure of the intervention, complications during the intervention and follow-up periods, use of early anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic medications, and the success rate of AF ablation 1 year after the intervention were compared between the two groups.
resultsIn comparison to the non-ICE group, the septal puncture time (6.27 ± 1.91 min vs. 7.21 ± 2.08 min, p = 0.022), left atrial modeling time (4.93 ± 1.84 min vs. 5.75 ± 1.96 min, p = 0.035), and total ablation time (67.73 ± 2.64 min vs. 73.35 ± 1.96 min, p < 0.001) in the ICE group were significantly reduced. Radiation exposure time (5.09 ± 0.23 min vs. 13.17 ± 0.28 min, p < 0.001) and radiation exposure (33.13 ± 1.99 mGy/cm
conclusionICE-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation is safe and effective in the treatment of AF, and it has potential advantages in terms of ablation time, radiation exposure, complication occurrence, and patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.