Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980476›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

An empirical study of using radiology reports and images to improve intensive care unit mortality prediction.

Mingquan Lin, Song Wang, Ying Ding, Lihui Zhao, Fei Wang, Yifan Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mingquan LinDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10022, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0862-6588
Song WangCockrell School of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-0424
Ying DingSchool of Information, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, United States.
Lihui ZhaoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
Fei WangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10022, United States.
Yifan PengDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10022, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9309-8331

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Multimodal AI Fusion Model for Early Detection for Pancreatic CancerR01CA289249 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Imon Banerjee, Yifan Peng · 2024 to 2026
$2.8M
ClinEX - Clinical Evidence Extraction, Representation, and AppraisalR01LM014344 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Yong Chen, Yifan Peng · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NCI NIH HHS R01 CA289249NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The predictive intensive care unit (ICU) scoring system is crucial for predicting patient outcomes, particularly mortality. Traditional scoring systems rely mainly on structured clinical data from electronic health records, which can overlook important clinical information in narratives and images. Materials and Methods: In this work, we build a deep learning-based survival prediction model that utilizes multimodality data for ICU mortality prediction. Four sets of features are investigated: (1) physiological measurements of Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, (2) common thorax diseases predefined by radiologists, (3) bidirectional encoder representations from transformers-based text representations, and (4) chest X-ray image features. The model was evaluated using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV dataset. Results: Our model achieves an average C-index of 0.7829 (95% CI, 0.7620-0.8038), surpassing the baseline using only SAPS-II features, which had a C-index of 0.7470 (95% CI: 0.7263-0.7676). Ablation studies further demonstrate the contributions of incorporating predefined labels (2.00% improvement), text features (2.44% improvement), and image features (2.82% improvement). Discussion and Conclusion: The deep learning model demonstrated superior performance to traditional machine learning methods under the same feature fusion setting for ICU mortality prediction. This study highlights the potential of integrating multimodal data into deep learning models to enhance the accuracy of ICU mortality prediction.

Indexed as

deep learningmortality predictionmultimodal fusion

Identifiers

PMID39980476
PMCPMC11841685

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.