ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025
Implantable cardiac monitor in heart failure: just a toy or a useful tool?
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) has gradually entered clinical practice in various fields. In addition to the consolidated indications in the study of syncope, cryptogenic stroke and in the management of patients with arrhythmias (suspected or defined), today a possible role for these devices in patients with heart failure (HF) is emerging. The rationale for the use of these devices in HF can be identified in three key areas: (i) identification of silent atrial fibrillation and reduction of the risk of stroke, (ii) stratification of the risk of brady-tachy arrhythmias and consequent reduction of the risk of sudden death, and (iii) identification of patients at risk of imminent exacerbation of HF and their early management with reduction of hospitalizations and episodes of clinical deterioration. For each of these areas, there are conflicting data regarding the real usefulness of ICMs; however, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the use of these devices, under certain conditions, may be useful in patients with HF. The adequate selection of patients to be candidates for this strategy is important. The choice of tools and the availability of an organization that allows the possibility of managing these patients remotely also play an essential role. In any case, case-control studies are needed to establish whether this tool can be truly useful in HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.