Evidence mapPaperPMID 39981082Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Machine learning-based myocardial infarction bibliometric analysis.

Ying Fang, Yuedi Wu, Lijuan Gao

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ying FangXiaoshan District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yuedi WuXiaoshan District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Lijuan GaoXiaoshan District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzed the research trends in machine learning (ML) pertaining to myocardial infarction (MI) from 2008 to 2024, aiming to identify emerging trends and hotspots in the field, providing insights into the future directions of research and development in ML for MI. Additionally, it compared the contributions of various countries, authors, and agencies to the field of ML research focused on MI. Method: A total of 1,036 publications were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection database. CiteSpace 6.3.R1, Bibliometrix, and VOSviewer were utilized to analyze bibliometric characteristics, determining the number of publications, countries, institutions, authors, keywords, and cited authors, documents, and journals in popular scientific fields. CiteSpace was used for temporal trend analysis, Bibliometrix for quantitative country and institutional analysis, and VOSviewer for visualization of collaboration networks. Results: Since the emergence of research literature on medical imaging and machine learning (ML) in 2008, interest in this field has grown rapidly, particularly since the pivotal moment in 2016. The ML and MI domains, represented by China and the United States, have experienced swift development in research after 2015, albeit with the United States significantly outperforming China in research quality (as evidenced by the higher impact factors of journals and citation counts of publications from the United States). Institutional collaborations have formed, notably between Harvard Medical School in the United States and Capital Medical University in China, highlighting the need for enhanced cooperation among domestic and international institutions. In the realm of MI and ML research, cooperative teams led by figures such as Dey, Damini, and Berman, Daniel S. in the United States have emerged, indicating that Chinese scholars should strengthen their collaborations and focus on both qualitative and quantitative development. The overall direction of MI and ML research trends toward Medicine, Medical Sciences, Molecular Biology, and Genetics. In particular, publications in "Circulation" and "Computers in Biology and Medicine" from the United States hold prominent positions in this study. Conclusion: This paper presents a comprehensive exploration of the research hotspots, trends, and future directions in the field of MI and ML over the past two decades. The analysis reveals that deep learning is an emerging research direction in MI, with neural networks playing a crucial role in early diagnosis, risk assessment, and rehabilitation therapy.

Indexed as

bibliometricsCiteSpacedeep learningmachine learningmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID39981082
PMCPMC11839716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.