ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2025
Clinical impact and safety of brain biopsy in unexplained central nervous system disorders: a real-world cohort study.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autoimmune Encephalitis as Treatment-Responsive Cause of Rapidly Progressive Dementia: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.Neurology · 2026Observational
- Autoimmune encephalitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA substantial part of central nervous system (CNS) disorders remains unexplained, despite various new and minimally invasive diagnostic techniques. Within this rapidly developing diagnostic field, the precise role of brain biopsy is unknown. We aimed to study the clinical impact and safety of brain biopsies in unexplained CNS disorders.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we included all adult patients who were referred for a diagnostic work-up to our academic center with neuro-inflammatory, neuro-oncological, and neuro-infectious expertise and underwent a brain biopsy between January 2010 and December 2023. Typical cases of CNS neoplasms and infections were not analyzed. Brain biopsies were evaluated with respect to diagnostic and therapeutic impact and complication risk.
resultsBrain biopsy was performed in 587 patients. Ninety-four patients with a CNS disorder of unknown cause, with 107 biopsies, were analyzed (44% female, median age 58 years). Postoperative diagnoses included brain tumors/lymphomas (37/94, 39%), inflammatory disorders (11/94, 12%), infections (8/94, 9%), autoimmune encephalitis (8/94, 9%), and primary angiitis of the CNS (4/94, 4%). Diagnostic yield of brain biopsy was 62%, increasing up to 72% after repeat biopsies, as 10 additional patients were diagnosed with a brain tumor. In 77% of patients, brain biopsy changed the treatment strategy. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 4 of 107 brain biopsies (4%).
interpretationIn a selected population of patients with unexplained CNS disorders, clinical impact of brain biopsies is high, while being relatively safe. A multidisciplinary team approach is fundamental in establishing optimal indication for brain biopsy and subsequent treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.