SynthesisAge and ageing2025
Comparison of hospitalisation settings and exercise interventions in acute care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Additional Exercise Interventions on Physical Performance and Muscle Strength of Frail Patients After Open-Heart Surgery: A Randomized Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Trial
- Strategies to promote safe mobilization of people with obesity in inpatient care settings: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInpatient hospitalisation is associated with adverse outcomes in older adults, including hospital-associated deconditioning. The hospital-at-home (HaH) model may promote physical activity. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares functional outcomes between inpatient and HaH settings and evaluates the efficacy of exercise interventions in both settings.
methodsSystematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and ScienceDirect were conducted on 27 April 2024. Three distinct searches were performed: (i) studies comparing HaH and inpatient hospitalisation, (ii) trials evaluating inpatient exercise interventions and (iii) research on HaH exercise interventions. Two reviewers independently selected studies published from 2014 onwards using the PICOS framework and they assessed quality using PEDro scale. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to analyse exercise interventions. This systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024598286).
resultsAmong the 9470 studies identified, nine studies comparing acute-care settings and 21 studies on exercise interventions (one in HaH) were included. Findings suggest that HaH may positively affect functional and cognitive outcomes. Inpatient exercise interventions significantly improved physical performance [standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.12-0.72] and functional independence (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.14-0.77) at discharge.
conclusionHaH may contribute to preserving physical and cognitive status. Supervised exercise interventions during inpatient hospitalisation are safe and effective for improving older adults' functional status, although further research in the HaH model is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.