ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
eNODAL: an experimentally guided nutriomics data clustering method to unravel complex drug-diet interactions.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting Algorithms, Tools, and Applications for Sequence and Phylogenetic Analyses in the NGS-Based Omics Era.Biochemical genetics · 2026Review
- Egg Nutriomics: Bridging Comprehensive Profiling and Precision Modulation of Bioactive Nutrient Factors in Eggs.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- DNA methylation-based surrogate markers of C-reactive protein and their associations with health-related traits.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Physical activity and DNA methylation-based markers of ageing in 6208 middle-aged and older Australians: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.GeroScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unraveling the complex interplay between nutrients and drugs via their effects on "omics" features could revolutionize our fundamental understanding of nutritional physiology, personalized nutrition, and, ultimately, human health span. Experimental studies in nutrition are starting to use large-scale "omics" experiments to pick apart the effects of such interacting factors. However, the high dimensionality of the omics features, coupled with complex fully factorial experimental designs, poses a challenge to the analysis. Current strategies for analyzing such types of data are based on between-feature correlations. However, these techniques risk overlooking important signals that arise from the experimental design and produce clusters that are hard to interpret. We present a novel approach for analyzing high-dimensional outcomes in nutriomics experiments, termed experiment-guided NutriOmics DatA cLustering ('eNODAL'). This three-step hybrid framework takes advantage of both Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)-type analyses and unsupervised learning methods to extract maximum information from experimental nutriomics studies. First, eNODAL categorizes the omics features into interpretable groups based on the significance of response to the different experimental variables using an ANOVA-like test. Such groups may include the main effects of a nutritional intervention and drug exposure or their interaction. Second, consensus clustering is performed within each interpretable group to further identify subclusters of features with similar response profiles to these experimental factors. Third, eNODAL annotates these subclusters based on their experimental responses and biological pathways enriched within the subcluster. We validate eNODAL using data from a mouse experiment to test for the interaction effects of macronutrient intake and drugs that target aging mechanisms in mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.