ArticleBMC public health2025
Predicting sleep quality among college students during COVID-19 lockdown using a LASSO-based neural network model.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Predictors of Paraben Exposure Among Adults in Northern Thailand.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn March 2022, a new outbreak of COVID-19 emerged in Quanzhou, leading to the implementation of strict lockdown management measures in colleges. While existing research has indicated that the pandemic has had a significant impact on sleep quality, the specific effects of containment measures on college students' sleep patterns remain understudied.
objectiveThis study aimed to understand the sleep quality of college students in Fujian Province during the epidemic and determine sensitive variables, in order to develop an efficient prediction model for the early screening of sleep problems in college students.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted April 5-16, 2022 to survey college students in Quanzhou. A total of 4959 college students in Quanzhou were enrolled in this study. Descriptive analysis, univariate analysis, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis were used to explore the influencing factors regarding sleep quality. In addition, we constructed eight sleep quality risk prediction models to predict sleep quality.
resultsA mean PSQI total score of 6.03 ± 3.21 and a sleep disorder rate of 29.4% (PSQI > 7) were obtained. Sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, diurnal dysfunction, and PSQI score were all higher than the national norm (P < 0.05). A total of eight significant predictors finally identified by the LASSO algorithm was incorporated into prediction models. Through a series of assessments, we identified the artificial neural network model as the best model, achieving an area under curve of 73.8% an accuracy of 67.3%, a precision of 84.0%, a recall of 66.3%, and an F1 score of 69.3%. These performance indices suggest that the ANN model outperforms other models. It is noteworthy that the threshold probabilities for net benefit were found to be between 0.81 and 0.92 and the clinical impact curve confirmed that the models' predictions were particularly effective in identifying individuals with poor sleep quality when the threshold probability was set above 70%. These findings underscore the potential clinical utility of our models for the early detection of sleep disorders.
conclusionsIn Quanzhou, under COVID-19 quarantine management, the sleep quality of college students was affected to a certain extent, and their PSQI scores were higher than the national average in China. The artificial neural network model had the best performance, and it is expected to be used to provide early interventions to prevent sleep disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.