Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39984943›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Patient-physician communication of health and risk information in the management of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a systematic scoping review.

Aloysius Wei-Yan Chia, Winnie Li-Lian Teo, Sanchalika Acharyya, Yasmin Lynda Munro, Rinkoo Dalan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hypertensive patient's journey in Poland.BMC health services research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aloysius Wei-Yan ChiaDepartment of Endocrinology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore. Aloysius_wy_chia@ttsh.com.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0847-035X
Winnie Li-Lian TeoGroup Education, National Healthcare Group, Annex@National Skin Centre, Level 3, 1 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308205, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4592-6344
Sanchalika AcharyyaClinical Research and Innovation Office, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Ng Teng Fong Centre for Healthcare Innovation (CHI), Level 2, 18 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308443, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0393-2000
Yasmin Lynda MunroMedical Library, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308232, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6261-0037
Rinkoo DalanDepartment of Endocrinology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9769-2696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe communication of health and risk information is an integral part of patient-physician interaction. Effective communication of risk information for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes has been shown to improve medication adherence, increase physical activity levels, and improve dietary control. Patients who understand their risk profile are better able to work towards modifying their lifestyle behaviours as part of a shared decision-making process with physicians. This scoping review examines the evidence on patient-physician risk communication strategies, approaches and interventions for CVDs and diabetes management in primary care and secondary outpatient settings.

methodsA comprehensive database search for quantitative and qualitative studies was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library from 1st January 2000 to 3rd October 2023. Two reviewers independently performed the screening of articles. Studies that report on patient-physician risk communication processes were included. Data were extracted and analysed using descriptive summaries and narrative synthesis. Results are reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included articles were appraised for quality following JBI critical appraisal and MMAT tools.

resultsA total of 8378 articles published between 1st Jan 2000 to 3rd October 2023 were screened. After a full-text review of 88 articles, a total of 30 articles, consisting of 15 qualitative, 14 quantitative and 1 mixed method studies were included. Common areas of inquiry among articles include: (1) understanding and recalling risk information, (2) strategies and approaches used by physicians to communicate risk, and (3) interventions to improve the communication of risk. Studies reveal how physicians use a range of strategies, approaches and interventions to discuss risk with patients. We present and discuss each theme narratively in detail.

conclusionsThere is a critical need for further research into risk communication strategies for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and diabetes, with a focus on developing targeted approaches that enhance patients' understanding of their risk profiles. Evidence-based guidelines should assist healthcare professionals improve risk communication within clinical settings, with the goal of facilitating patient comprehension of health risks that can sustain lifestyle changes. Misalignment in communication may lead to dissatisfaction and confusion, which may impede the effective management of chronic conditions.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCommunicationDiabetes MellitusPhysician-Patient RelationsHumansCardiovascular diseaseChronic disease managementDecision toolsDiabetes mellitusInterpretation of riskPatient-physician communicationRisk communicationRisk factor communicationRisk presentationShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID39984943
PMCPMC11846366

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.