ArticleBMC medicine2025
Patient-physician communication of health and risk information in the management of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a systematic scoping review.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient and family perspectives on cascade screening for thoracic aortic disease: a mixed-methods evaluation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Article
- Beyond prescriptions: an analysis of patient journey, self-management adherence, and unmet needs in type 2 diabetes.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- External validation and recalibration of the psychosis metabolic risk calculator (PsyMetRiC) in young adults with chronic psychotic disorders in the Netherlands.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026Article
- Black Parent's Perceptions of Discussing Cardiovascular Disease Risk with Primary Care Clinicians: a Qualitative Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Evaluating the performance of a generative AI model in assessing qualitative health research articles adherence to objective reporting standards.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The effectiveness of eHealth-based cardiovascular disease risk communication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Hypertensive patient's journey in Poland.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Factors Associated with Medication Adherence and Glycemic Control among American Indian/Alaska Native Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Within a Commercial Health Care System: A System-Wide Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe communication of health and risk information is an integral part of patient-physician interaction. Effective communication of risk information for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes has been shown to improve medication adherence, increase physical activity levels, and improve dietary control. Patients who understand their risk profile are better able to work towards modifying their lifestyle behaviours as part of a shared decision-making process with physicians. This scoping review examines the evidence on patient-physician risk communication strategies, approaches and interventions for CVDs and diabetes management in primary care and secondary outpatient settings.
methodsA comprehensive database search for quantitative and qualitative studies was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library from 1st January 2000 to 3rd October 2023. Two reviewers independently performed the screening of articles. Studies that report on patient-physician risk communication processes were included. Data were extracted and analysed using descriptive summaries and narrative synthesis. Results are reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included articles were appraised for quality following JBI critical appraisal and MMAT tools.
resultsA total of 8378 articles published between 1st Jan 2000 to 3rd October 2023 were screened. After a full-text review of 88 articles, a total of 30 articles, consisting of 15 qualitative, 14 quantitative and 1 mixed method studies were included. Common areas of inquiry among articles include: (1) understanding and recalling risk information, (2) strategies and approaches used by physicians to communicate risk, and (3) interventions to improve the communication of risk. Studies reveal how physicians use a range of strategies, approaches and interventions to discuss risk with patients. We present and discuss each theme narratively in detail.
conclusionsThere is a critical need for further research into risk communication strategies for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and diabetes, with a focus on developing targeted approaches that enhance patients' understanding of their risk profiles. Evidence-based guidelines should assist healthcare professionals improve risk communication within clinical settings, with the goal of facilitating patient comprehension of health risks that can sustain lifestyle changes. Misalignment in communication may lead to dissatisfaction and confusion, which may impede the effective management of chronic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.