Evidence mapPaperPMID 39985270Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025

Impact of Regulatory Post-Market Safety Advisories on Prescribing Practices: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Seonji Kim, Subin Kim, Chungsoo Kim, Junhyuk Chang, Rae Woong Park, Kyung Won Kim, Seng Chan You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seonji Kim *Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4993-7537
Subin Kim *Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7155-2273
Chungsoo KimSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1802-1777
Junhyuk ChangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9622-0232
Rae Woong ParkDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4989-3287
Kyung Won KimInstitute for Innovation in Digital Healthcare, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4529-6135
Seng Chan YouDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5052-6399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Less frequent adverse drug reactions are usually discovered after a drug's release to the market, making effective and timely communication of regulatory post-market advisories essential for preventing emerging adverse effects. Time series analysis is a key study design for assessing the impact of post-market safety advisories. However, most previous studies have focused on narrow evaluations, limiting systematic assessment of how different safety advisories affect prescribing practices. This study aimed to investigate changes in prescribing practices following regulatory post-market safety advisories in Korea. Interrupted time series analyses were conducted using nationwide claims data from 2018 to 2021 and hospital datasets covering the period from 2 years before and 3 years after post-market safety advisories. We categorized the selected drugs into two groups: safety warning through letters and real-time safety alarms (contraindications or requiring attention). Twelve post-market safety advisories were analyzed, including four safety warnings and eight safety alarms, which showed an overall relative reduction (safety warning: relative change [95% confidence interval]: -8.06% [-10.23% to -5.84%], safety alarm on contraindication: -92.65% [-95.65% to -87.59%], and safety alarm on requiring attention: -8.04% [-9.98% to -6.05%]). All types of regulatory interventions reduced the prescribing of targeted drugs; however, the magnitude of these effects differed substantially depending on the type of intervention. By identifying and comparing the influence of regulatory post-market safety advisories, we can enhance these measures to better protect patient health. Continuous monitoring and systematic assessment of safety-related regulatory advisories, with ensured reproducibility, are warranted to optimize effectiveness and ensure safe medication practices.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Product Surveillance, PostmarketingAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug LabelingHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisRepublic of Korea

Identifiers

PMID39985270
PMCPMC12087685

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.