Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39986949›Full record

SynthesisInternational psychogeriatrics2025

Geographical inequalities in dementia diagnosis and care: A systematic review.

Clarissa Giebel, Megan Rose Readman, Abigail Godfrey, Annabel Gray, Joan Carton, Megan Polden

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International psychogeriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Personal and Family Perspectives Regarding Neurodegenerative Disorder Risk.Journal of community medicine & public health · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clarissa GiebelDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: clarissa.giebel@liverpool.ac.uk.
Megan Rose ReadmanDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK; Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Abigail GodfreyDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, UK.
Annabel GrayDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, UK.
Joan CartonNIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK.
Megan PoldenDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK; Department of Health Research, Lancaster, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with dementia can be disadvantaged in accessing health and social care services for diagnosis and care depending on where they live (including rural vs suburban vs. urban; postcode; country). Without an existing comprehensive synthesis of the evidence to date, the aim of this systematic review was to explore the evidence on geographical inequalities in accessing services for dementia diagnosis and care.

methodsFive databases were searched in June 2024, including studies conducted in any country, published from 2010 onwards, and in English or German. Titles and abstracts, and then full texts, were screened by at least two reviewers each. Any discrepancies were resolved in discussion with a third reviewer. Data were extracted by two researchers and synthesised narratively.

resultsFrom 1321 studies screened and 49 full texts read, 32 studies were included in the final review. Most studies were conducted in the US, followed by the UK. Geographical inequalities in dementia are most often evidenced in relation to availability and suitability of services in different regions within a country, or a lack thereof. People with dementia residing in rural areas often experience challenges in receiving a timely diagnosis and accessing health and social care. No research has addressed geographical inequalities in accessing residential care. Innovative models on improving efficiency and quantity of diagnosis rates in rural Canada and Australia emerged.

conclusionsHealth and social care services in rural areas need to be increased and made more suitable to the needs of people with dementia. More research needs to explore inequalities experienced by people with rarer forms of dementia. National strategies to overhaul the health and social care system need to focus on the rurality issue and recommend strategies to improve service access.

Indexed as

DementiaHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityAustraliaCanadaHumansRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsDementiaDiagnosisGeographical inequalitiesRuralService access

Identifiers

PMID39986949
PMCPMC12149024

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.