ArticleScientific reports2025
Fast, smart, and adaptive: using machine learning to optimize mental health assessment and monitor change over time.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Validating an adaptive digital assessment of youth mental health needs: a cross-sectional study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Gender differences in symptom profiles of individuals being treated for mood disorders.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2025Article
- Integration of Multi-Modal Biosensing Approaches for Depression: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In mental health, accurate symptom assessment and precise measurement of patient conditions are crucial for clinical decision-making and effective treatment planning. Traditional assessment methods can be burdensome, especially for vulnerable populations, leading to decreased motivation and potentially unreliable results. Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) has emerged as a solution, offering efficient and personalized assessments. In particular, Machine Learning-based CAT (MT-based CATs) enables adaptive, rapid, and accurate evaluations that are more easily implementable than traditional methods. This approach bypasses typical item selection processes and the associated computational costs while avoiding the rigid assumptions of traditional CAT approaches. This study investigates the effectiveness of Machine Learning-Model Tree-based CAT (ML-MT-based CAT) in detecting changes in mental health measures collected at four time points (6-month intervals between February 2018 and December 2019). Three CATs measuring generalized anxiety, depression, and social anxiety were developed and tested on a dataset with responses from 564 participants. A cross-validation approach based on real data simulations was used. Results showed that ML-MT-based CATs produced estimates of trait levels comparable to full-length tests while reducing the number of items administered by 50% or more. In addition, ML-MT-based CATs captured changes in trait levels consistent with full-length tests, outperforming short static measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.