Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39987332›Full record

SynthesisClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following docetaxel failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Izael Pereira da Silva, Lucas Guimarães Campos Roriz de Amorim, Gabriel Vieira Piredda, Marcelo Mass-Lindenbaum, Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Pedro F S Freitas, Bárbara Vieira Lima Aguiar Melão, Helisandro Montenegro Brandão, Karine Martins da Trindade

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Izael Pereira da Silva *Department of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6711-8886
Lucas Guimarães Campos Roriz de Amorim *Division of Urology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2054-1978
Gabriel Vieira PireddaDepartment of Medicine, UniRedentor, Itaperuna, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9669-8516
Marcelo Mass-LindenbaumDepartment of Medicine, Centro de Innovación en Piso Pélvico, Hospital Sótero del Río, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1027-8412
Francisco Cezar Aquino de MoraesDepartment of Medicine, Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-8135
Pedro F S FreitasDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4497-3923
Bárbara Vieira Lima Aguiar MelãoDivision of Urology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8754-5198
Helisandro Montenegro BrandãoDivision of Urology, Hospital Federal do Andaraí, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0845-9651
Karine Martins da TrindadeLatin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Genitourinary Group (LACOG-GU), Porto Alegre, Brazil. karine.trindade@rededor.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4947-0304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) includes chemotherapy and inhibition of the androgen receptor pathway. However, the optimal treatment sequence in this scenario is not yet fully understood. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide for efficacy and safety outcomes as second-line therapy in mCRPC patients after docetaxel failure.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for interventional studies comparing cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide for patients with mCRPC who have experienced treatment failure with docetaxel as their first-line therapy. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsEight studies, comprising 1,897 patients were included, of whom 548 (28.8%) received cabazitaxel. Mean follow-up time ranged from 3 to 16.4 months. Median age ranged from 68.1 to 73.9 years in the cabazitaxel group, and 68.0 to 73.1 years in the abiraterone or enzalutamide group. In our meta-analysis, cabazitaxel significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) rates (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.47-0.78; p < 0.001) compared to abiraterone or enzalutamide. There were no differences between groups in overall survival (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.46-1.24; p = 0.27), therapy-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) (OR 3.00; 95% CI 0.72-12.40; p = 0.12), and PSA decline ≥ 50% (OR 1.20; 95% CI 0.51-2.80; p = 0.67).

conclusionsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis of men with mCRPC after docetaxel failure, second-line therapy with cabazitaxel was associated with a longer PFS compared with abiraterone or enzalutamide, though without a significant difference in OS.

Indexed as

AndrostenesAntineoplastic AgentsPhenylthiohydantoinProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantTaxoidsBenzamidesDocetaxelHumansMaleNitrilesTreatment FailureabirateroneAndrostenesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidescabazitaxelDocetaxelenzalutamideNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinTaxoidsAbiraterone acetateAndrogen deprivation therapyAntiandrogenCabazitaxelCastration-resistant prostate cancerEnzalutamide

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.