ArticleContemporary clinical trials2025
Design of a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of interrupting sitting on type 2 diabetes risk factors in children with overweight/obesity: The sedentary behavior study 3 protocol.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSedentary behaviors are pervasive in children. We found acute 3-h improvements in metabolic and affective outcomes by interrupting sitting. It is unknown whether acute responses translate to sustained or improved responses over multiple days. This paper describes the rationale, study design, recruitment, data collection, and data analytic protocols for the Sedentary Behavior Study 3 (SBS3).
methodsThis is a 3-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial of N = 150 (50 per group) 8-11-year-old children with overweight/obesity. Following screening and 7-10 day baseline free-living assessment, children are randomly assigned to complete one of three in-lab conditions for 3 h/day for 7 consecutive days: (1) continuous sitting (SIT); (2) sitting interrupted by 3-min bouts of moderate-intensity walking every 30 min (SIT+WALK); or (3) a single 18-min bout of moderate-intensity walking followed by continuous sitting (EX). Three-hour oral glucose tolerance tests are conducted on Days 1 and 7. Participants also wear continuous glucose monitors and accelerometers for the duration of the study, and complete daily 24-h dietary recalls and affective assessments.
conclusionsThe overall aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of interrupting sitting over one week on glucose homeostasis (primary outcome) and secondary (cognitive and affective) outcomes in children. If successful, it will provide novel intervention strategies that can be translated to other settings, and age and weight groups, thereby contributing to efforts at reducing type 2 diabetes risk in U.S. youth.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT04469790, registered July 14, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.