ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Secondary prevention of preeclampsia.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Immunopathology of Preeclampsia.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Early interventions for the prevention of preeclampsia in pregnant women at increased risk: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- The Indonesia pre-eclampsia study (INAPRES): Pregnancy outcomes in pregnancy with pre-eclampsia in Indonesia.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study: association between aspirin regime and early- and late-onset preeclampsia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- From empirical regimens to precision prophylaxis: mechanism-based targeting of preeclampsia phenotypes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preventing preeclampsia (PE) is crucial for the wellbeing of the mother, fetus, and the neonate with three levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Secondary prevention involves pharmacological therapies aimed at stopping the disease's progression before clinical signs. The predominant approach currently employed is the daily administration of low dose Aspirin and calcium. PE is a multifaceted illness characterized by syncytiotrophoblast (STB) stress, leading to endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation. Various subtypes of PE, in particular early-onset PE (EOP) and late-onset PE (LOP), have different pathophysiological pathways leading to STB stress and also different perinatal outcomes. Low-dose Aspirin (LDA) has been shown to be beneficial in lowering the occurrence of EOP, especially when started before 16 weeks of pregnancy. Calcium supplementation is advantageous for women with poor dietary calcium intake, reducing endothelium activation and hypertension. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), have pleiotropic effects, besides their anticoagulant effects, LMWH have significant anti-inflammatory effects, and have a potential restricted use in patients with history of prior severe placental vasculopathy with or without the maternal preeclamptic syndrome. Pravastatin and other statins have shown positive results in lowering preterm PE and improving outcomes for both the mother and baby. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have shown potential in lowering soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) levels and enhancing endothelial function, but clinical trials have been inconsistent. Metformin, primarily used for improving insulin sensitivity, has potential advantages in decreasing PE incidence due to its anti-inflammatory and vascular properties, particularly in morbidly obese women. Nitric oxide (NO) donors and L-arginine have been shown to effectively reduce vascular resistance and improving blood flow to placenta, potentially reducing PE risk. In conclusion, various pharmacological treatments have the potential to prevent secondary PE, but their effectiveness depends on underlying risk factors and intervention time. Further research is needed to determine the optimal (combination) of method(s) for the individual patient with her individual risk profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.