ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Risk Factors of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for prolonged mechanical ventilation following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and In-Hospital Mortality Following Open-Heart Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cardiology research · 2026Article
- Predictors of Prolonged ICU Stay After Isolated CABG: The Role of MiECC.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Physical Performance as a Predictor of Length of Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery: A Multicenter Prospective Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Heightened propofol sensitivity and distinct electroencephalographic signatures in patients with valvular heart disease.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) following CABG surgery is associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality. A consensus has yet to be reached regarding the time limit for PMV. Various studies have identified factors that influence PMV in patients following CABG surgery, but a review has yet to synthesize the results systematically. This review aimed to identify the definition and factors associated with PMV in patients following isolated CABG surgery. This scoping review used the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005). Primary sources of information were searched through 5 databases: PubMed, Scopus, Oxford Academy, Sage, and CINAHL and two search engines: Science Direct and Google Scholar, accessed on October 25, 2023. Eight articles with a total of 12,178 participants were included in this review. The PMV time limits used in the studies varied from >12 hours to >48 hours. The factors affecting PMV were grouped into preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative, with factors that have a high influence, including NYHA class, acute kidney injury and mediastinitis. Differences in the number of factors examined, criteria, characteristics, and time limits of the PMV used to make the study's results vary. Establishing guidelines regarding PMV time limits is essential according to current conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.