ArticleScientific reports2025
Air trapping in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Nomogram Model for Early Mortality Risk Stratification in Elderly Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Integrative Analysis of Serum Biomarkers and Pulmonary Function Parameters.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predictors of Disease Progression in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Under Antifibrotic Therapy: A Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterised by progressive worsening of lung function. In some cases, IPF is accompanied by air-trapping and emphysema. This study aimed to evaluate air trapping quantified with RV/TLC in patients with IPF. This retrospective study included 122 patients diagnosed with IPF in South Korea between January 2011 and December 2020. Air trapping was defined as RV/TLC ≥ 0.40. Increased RV/TLC was found in 34.4% of all patients. The RV/TLC negatively correlated with lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s and functional vital capacity [FVC]) and showed consistent results after 1 year of follow-up. After propensity score matching, FVC and diffusion capacity between the groups showed no statistical difference. No difference in lung function decline was found between the increased and not increased RV/TLC groups. Regarding univariable analysis, the patients in the increased RV/TLC group had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.753, P = 0.034). Using multivariable analysis, age, pirfenidone treatment, and FVC were significant factors for survival but not increased RV/TLC. Increased RV/TLC was related to emphysema and demonstrated a negative relationship with lung function. Although increased RV/TLC might relate to poor clinical outcome, it was not independent prognostic factor for IPF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.