ArticleJournal of Yeungnam medical science2025
Patient-specific predictors of successful frozen embryo transfer using the freeze-all protocol: a retrospective observational study.
Article in Journal of Yeungnam medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to examine various patient factors affecting first programmed embryo transfer (ET) outcomes under the freeze-all policy at a single tertiary university infertility center.
methodsThis retrospective observational study reviewed the medical records of 243 couples who underwent their first ET using blastocysts collected under the freeze-all antagonist-controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol from 2015 to 2023. Patients were grouped into pregnant and nonpregnant groups, and their data, including demographics, COS and ET outcomes, and embryo storage duration, were analyzed.
resultsPatient body mass index, cause of infertility, follicle-to-oocyte index, distribution of blastocyst grades, number of transferred embryos, and embryo storage duration were not significantly different between the groups. In a simple comparative analysis, patients with successful clinical pregnancy tended to have significantly lower female and male age (33.83±3.67 and 35.32±4.54 years vs. 37.07±4.15 and 39.33±5.60 years, respectively), higher anti-Müllerian hormone levels (6.27±5.32 ng/mL vs. 4.14±3.82 ng/mL) and antral follicle counts (14.20±8.26 vs. 10.04±5.75), and higher numbers of retrieved oocytes and metaphase II oocytes (13.74±6.92 and 9.64±6.19 vs. 11.21±6.04 and 7.53±5.56, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of these variables revealed that only male age was a significant factor for successful clinical pregnancy (odds ratio, 4.768; 95% confidence interval, 1.252-18.162; p=0.022).
conclusionDuring the first programmed ET using blastocysts collected under the freeze-all antagonist COS protocol, male age and correspondingly the quality of gametes for fertilization were crucial for successful pregnancy, having more importance than calculated female ovarian reserve and embryo storage duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.