ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Consumption, relative deprivation and mental health: evidence from hedonic consumption.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibition or promotion: a study on the impact of relocation on the mental health of left-behind women.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Beyond iodine nutrition: socioeconomic patterns independently drive thyroid disease risk in pregnant women in Xinjiang.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The impact of regional environmental governance efficiency on residents' life satisfaction-an empirical analysis of panel data from 21 cities in Guangdong Province, China (2001-2023).Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, relative deprivation related to consumption has sparked intense debate, particularly as the COVID-19 pandemic caused incalculable economic losses worldwide. However, the relationship between relative deprivation related to consumption and mental health remains largely unexplored. This study investigates how both vertical (household-level) and horizontal (household-to-household) relative deprivation related to consumption affect mental health, with a focus on hedonic consumption, and identifies underlying channels and moderating factors. Methods: We analyze data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) covering 88,144 observations from 2010 to 2018. Hedonic consumption is measured through expenditure on items such as jewelry, antiques, and entertainment, while consumption inequality is assessed using the Kakwani index. Mental health is evaluated using the CES-D and Kessler 6 scales. Ordinary least squares (OLS) and two-stage least squares (2SLS) methods are employed. Results: Our findings show that reductions in hedonic consumption negatively impact mental health, with involuntary and sudden declines resulting in more pronounced deterioration. Furthermore, greater consumption inequality exacerbates mental health issues, and perceived unfair treatment amplifies this effect. Additionally, self-perception and trust levels are identified as key channels through which these effects. Furthermore, cultural variations and social capital are moderating roles to diminish the adverse mental health. Conclusion: This study advances our understanding of how relative deprivation related to consumption affects mental health and offers valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners aiming to address these challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.