ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Development and functional validation of a disulfidoptosis-related gene prognostic model for lung adenocarcinoma based on bioinformatics and experimental validation.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Disulfidoptosis is increasingly linked to cancer progression, yet its immunological impacts and prognostic value in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remain poorly understood. This study aims to delineate the predictive significance of disulfidoptosis-related genes (DRGs) in LUAD, their potential as therapeutic targets, and their interaction with the tumor microenvironment. Methods: We analyzed the expression profiles of 23 DRGs and survival data, performing consensus clustering to identify molecular subtypes. Survival analysis and gene set variation analysis (GSVA) were used to explore cluster differences. Key DRGs were selected for Cox and LASSO regression to develop a prognostic model. Tensin4 (TNS4), a key gene in the model, was further evaluated through immunohistochemistry (IHC) in LUAD and normal tissues and gene knockdown experiments Results: Two clusters were identified, with 225 differentially expressed genes. A six-gene signature was developed, which classified LUAD patients into high- and low-risk groups, showing significant survival differences. The risk score independently predicted LUAD prognosis and correlated with immunotherapy responses. IHC showed elevated TNS4 levels in LUAD tissues, while Conclusion: This study highlights the role of DRGs in LUAD, with a validated gene signature offering new avenues for targeted therapies, potentially improving LUAD treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.