ReviewCurrent research in structural biology2025
AI-based quality assessment methods for protein structure models from cryo-EM.
Review in Current research in structural biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DAQplugin: Interactive Deep Learning-Based Validation of Cryo-EM Protein Models in ChimeraX.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Accurate Macromolecular Complex Modeling for Cryo-EM with CryoZeta.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Advancing structure modeling from cryo-EM maps with deep learning.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
- Connecting the dots: deep learning-based automated model building methods in cryo-EM.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has revolutionized structural biology, with an increasing number of structures being determined by cryo-EM each year, many at higher resolutions. However, challenges remain in accurately interpreting cryo-EM maps. Inaccuracies can arise in regions of locally low resolution, where manual model building is more prone to errors. Validation scores for structure models have been developed to assess both the compatibility between map density and the structure, as well as the geometric and stereochemical properties of protein models. Recent advancements have introduced artificial intelligence (AI) into this field. These emerging AI-driven tools offer unique capabilities in the validation and refinement of cryo-EM-derived protein atomic models, potentially leading to more accurate protein structures and deeper insights into complex biological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.