ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Whitening Efficiency of Papain and Bromelain Gels in Removing Dental Stains.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of carbamide peroxide and bromelain bleaching agents by the activation of diode laser on the tooth at different time intervals: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue "Global Excellence in Bioactive Gels".Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the micro-nanostructure and color changes of dental enamel after treatment with new gel formulations containing papain or bromelain. Eighty caries-free, extracted human teeth were randomly divided into two groups (n = 40) and stained by immersion in either coffee or Tedi juice for 4 h daily over five consecutive days. After staining, the samples were washed and stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C. The stained samples were then treated with four different whitening gels (GC, G1, G2, and Opalescence 15%) for 4 h daily. Following each treatment, the samples were rinsed and stored in artificial saliva. Color changes were measured using a digital spectrophotometer to assess CIEL*a*b* ΔE* and the Whiteness index (WI). The enamel micro-nanostructure was analyzed using SEM and AFM. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test. The results showed that gels containing papain and bromelain were more effective than the commercial gel in removing stains. SEM and AFM analysis indicated that papain was particularly effective for removing coffee stains, while bromelain was better for stains from natural juices. Healthy enamel has a Ra value of approximately 10 nm, which increases to about 40 nm after staining. Papain restored enamel roughness to approximately 8 nm for coffee stains and bromelain restored it to 11 nm for juice stains, delivering optimal results, while commercial gel ensures a roughness of about 15 nm after stain removal. CIELAB reveals notable changes in ΔE and WI after bleaching, revealing that papain gel is optimal for coffee stain removal and bromelain gel is optimal for natural juice stains. In conclusion, dental stains should be assessed by a dentist to determine the most suitable gel for achieving optimal results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.