ArticleBiosensors2025
Biomechanical Risk Classification in Repetitive Lifting Using Multi-Sensor Electromyography Data, Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation, and Deep Learning.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence for Recognizing Work Postures to Prevent Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Occupational Activity.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repetitive lifting tasks in occupational settings often result in shoulder injuries, impacting both health and productivity. Accurately assessing the biomechanical risk of these tasks remains a significant challenge in occupational ergonomics, particularly within manufacturing environments. Traditional assessment methods frequently rely on subjective reports and limited observations, which can introduce bias and yield incomplete evaluations. This study addresses these limitations by generating and utilizing a comprehensive dataset containing detailed time-series electromyography (EMG) data from 25 participants. Using high-precision wearable sensors, EMG data were collected from eight muscles as participants performed repetitive lifting tasks. For each task, the lifting index was calculated using the revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) lifting equation (RNLE). Participants completed cycles of both low-risk and high-risk repetitive lifting tasks within a four-minute period, allowing for the assessment of muscle performance under realistic working conditions. This extensive dataset, comprising over 7 million data points sampled at approximately 1259 Hz, was leveraged to develop deep learning models to classify lifting risk. To provide actionable insights for practical occupational ergonomics and risk assessments, statistical features were extracted from the raw EMG data. Three deep learning models, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), were employed to analyze the data and predict the occupational lifting risk level. The CNN model achieved the highest performance, with a precision of 98.92% and a recall of 98.57%, proving its effectiveness for real-time risk assessments. These findings underscore the importance of aligning model architectures with data characteristics to optimize risk management. By integrating wearable EMG sensors with deep learning models, this study enables precise, real-time, and dynamic risk assessments, significantly enhancing workplace safety protocols. This approach has the potential to improve safety planning and reduce the incidence and severity of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ultimately promoting better health and safety outcomes across various occupational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.