Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39997919›Full record

ReviewToxics2025

New Methodologies and Techniques for Biomonitoring Pesticide Exposure in Agricultural Workers: A Systematic Review.

Andreia Moreira, Joana Guedes, Manuela Vieira da Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andreia MoreiraDoctoral Programme in Occupational Safety and Health Student (DemSSO), Faculty of Engineering of University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0001-6346-2080
Joana GuedesAssociated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics (PROA/LAETA), Faculty of Engineering of University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2367-2187
Manuela Vieira da SilvaREQUIMTE/LAQV, E2S, Polythecnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida no. 400, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1256-990X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomonitoring allows for the assessment of internal exposure to various pesticides and metabolites. Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review aims to summarise innovative biomonitoring techniques for assessing pesticide exposure in agricultural workers, their advantages and limitations, and their applicability. The search of the Medline/PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science databases identified 14 articles dealing with new techniques for biomonitoring pesticide exposure in agricultural workers. These new methodologies have identified several biomarkers associated with exposure to organophosphates. Most of the included studies combine and/or improve traditional methods to overcome their limitations. This leads to more sensitive, specific, and precise techniques with lower detection and quantification limits. Therefore, it is necessary to thoroughly analyse and test new biomonitoring methods for assessing pesticide exposure. These techniques can complement qualitative risk assessments and aid in developing strategies to protect public health and the environment.

Indexed as

agricultural workersbiomonitoringnew techniquespesticide exposure

Identifiers

PMID39997919
PMCPMC11861711

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.