ReviewHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2025
Reducing LDL-Cholesterol to Very Low Levels: Sailing Between Established Benefits and Potential Risks.
Review in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Changes in Serum Procalcitonin After Bariatric Surgery and Their Associations with Anthropometric, Metabolic, and Inflammatory Parameters.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- New Risk Factor-Weighted Clinical Likelihood (RF-CL) in Diagnosis of Chronic Coronary Syndrome in Men and Women: Our First Impressions About the Differences and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Upfront Combination or Stepwise Escalation: Personalising LDL-C Reduction in Clinical Practice.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Predictors of Escalation of Lipid-Lowering Therapy with Subanalysis of the Influence of Lipoprotein (a) on the Decision-Making Process.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In view of the growing evidence supporting more marked reductions of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), according to the concept of "the lower is better" and with the availability of powerful and well tolerated lipid-lowering drugs, physicians are facing today with the clinical management of patients with very low LDL-C levels. The fear of potential risks linked to extreme reductions of LDL-C down to very low levels may lead to the de-escalation of treatments with consequent paradoxical unfavorable consequences due to the exposure to a higher cardiovascular risk. The aim of this review is to point out evidence of very low LDL-C clinical impact, with a focus on potential adverse effects. Research on cholesterol homeostasis has identified complex mechanisms which guarantee cell functions even when circulating cholesterol levels are very low. The almost complete self-sufficiency of the human body in terms of cholesterol needs is confirmed by evidence derived from genetically determined models with very low LDL-C levels. Studies on the potential harm of lowering LDL-C to very low concentrations do not confirm an increased risk of cancer or neurodegenerative disease attributable to lipid-lowering treatments, whereas evidence suggests a potential benefit in these settings. A potential increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke has been reported, suggesting tight monitoring and control of blood pressure should be implemented in patients with very low LDL-C levels. With regard to statin treatment, a dose-dependent increased risk of newly diagnosed diabetes has been reported. This adverse effect has not been found with more recently approved lipid-lowering drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39998740What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.